This site would like to set some non-essential temporary cookies. Some cookies we use are essential to make our site work.
Others such as Google Analytics help us to improve the site or provide additional but non-essential features to you.
No behavioural or tracking cookies are used.
To change your consent settings, read about the cookies we set and your privacy, please see our Privacy Policy
Back to Contents
Volume: 4 Issue: 1
( 2004)
Keywords:
european
court
justice
held
exists
likelihood
aural
confusion
between
word
mark
indication
geographical
origin
product
use
indication
comply
honest
TRADEMARKS: The European Court of Justice has held that where there exists a likelihood of aural confusion between a word mark and an indication of the geographical origin of a product, the use of the indication need only comply with honest practices in industrial and commercial matters.
Gerolsteiner Brunnen GmbH v Putsch GmbH
European Court of Justice.
Where there exists a likelihood of aural confusion between a word mark and an indication of the geographical origin of a product, the use of the indication need only comply with honest practices in industrial and commercial matters.
You must be logged in and have an active full subscription to view full articles. Log in now
Comments
You must be logged in and have an active full subscription to view and post comments. Log in now
Social Media
