This site would like to set some non-essential temporary cookies. Some cookies we use are essential to make our site work.
Others such as Google Analytics help us to improve the site or provide additional but non-essential features to you.
No behavioural or tracking cookies are used.
To change your consent settings, read about the cookies we set and your privacy, please see our Privacy Policy



Back to Contents

Volume: 2 Issue: 5
( 2003)

Keywords:
de lotto gambelli state lottery social repsonsibility advocat general alber

Authors:
tjeerd veenstra

Organisations:
de lotto

Jurisdictions:
eu europe

Opinion de Lotto Netherlands: Advocate General: no ‘Copernican revolution’

Advocate General Alber delivered on 13 March 2003 his Opinion in the long-awaited Gambelli case. Following the publication of the Opinion, some have indicated that the Gambelli case will break down the national gaming monopolies. I personally do not understand the fuss created over the Gambelli Opinion, as Alber’s opinion is merely a confirmation of the well-established case-law of the European Court of Justice (see the Court’s judgments in Schindler, Läärä and Zenatti). The Opinion certainly does not constitute a “Copernican revolution”, as suggested by certain adherents of a European gaming market, but could even result in more restrictive national gaming monopolies.

You must be logged in and have an active full subscription to view full articles. Log in now

Comments

You must be logged in and have an active full subscription to view and post comments.Log in now