This site would like to set some non-essential temporary cookies. Some cookies we use are essential to make our site work.
Others such as Google Analytics help us to improve the site or provide additional but non-essential features to you.
No behavioural or tracking cookies are used.
To change your consent settings, read about the cookies we set and your privacy, please see our Privacy Policy

Publications

Conferences

DataGuidance

About Us

My Account

Home

About

Editorial Board

Testing: Testing gaming software - a critique of the outcome approach

Sometime ago I wrote two articles (see World Online Gambling Law Report October & November 2002) about testing, the main premise of which was to communicate why ‘outcome based testing’ did not meet the certification requirements of well-regulated Interactive gaming jurisdictions. Since then we have seen the formation of eCOGRA, an allegedly independent organisation proposing a Total Gaming Transaction Review (“TGTR”) approach that is in fact no different to the outcome based testing approach that led me to write my articles. This article reviews the arguments for TGTR.

You must be logged in and have an active full subscription to view full articles.
Log in now

If you are not already a subscriber, take a subscription for full access to our entire online archives.
Subscribe