Volume: 10 Issue: 4
(April 2012)
Keywords:
broadcasting
time
shifting
live
sport
free
optus
case
implications
2011
telstra
paid
a$153
million
exclusive
internet
broadcasting
rights
australian
Jurisdictions:
Australia
UK
US
Options:
![]()
In 2011, Telstra paid A$153 million for exclusive internet broadcasting rights to Australian Football League (AFL) games from 2012 - 2016. However, a recent decision of the Federal Court has allowed its competitor, Singtel Optus Pty Ltd (Optus), to enable its customers to view matches without paying for the right to do so. Amelia Lynch and James O'Toole, of Lander & Rogers, explain the decision in Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v National Rugby League Investments (No 2)1 and consider the implications in Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States.
HOT TOPIC: Premier League Financial Fair Play Regulations
Interview with Graham Arthur, UK Anti-Doping Director of Legal Interview with Andy Parkinson, Chief Executive of UK Anti-Doping Interview with Richard McLaren, Arbitrator at the Court of Arbitration for Sport Interview: Maxime Verhagen, Dutch Minister for Economic Affairs, Innovation and Agriculture UK: Legal Services Act: what it means for the legal industryUEFA's Financial Fair Play Regulations and compliance with EU law
Cricket disciplinary appeal is an Arbitration
ASADA investigates the NRL - a legal perspective
Free TV Australia proposes ban on the promotion of live odds
Liar, Liar - Should Polygraph Evidence be used in Sports Tribunals?
Former Chelsea Football Club Sports Psychologist sues Vancouver Canucks over work permit dispute
Newcastle could appeal to FIFA against FA’s decision not to sanction McManaman
Education and Intervention Key To Tackling Doping in Sport
Tacking Doping in Sport Day 2: Code Revisions Need Closer Examination