This site would like to set some non-essential temporary cookies. Some cookies we use are essential to make our site work.
Others such as Google Analytics help us to improve the site or provide additional but non-essential features to you.
No behavioural or tracking cookies are used.
To change your consent settings, read about the cookies we set and your privacy, please see our Privacy Policy



Back to Contents

Volume: 10 Issue: 4
(April 2012)

Keywords:
sanctions challenging sanctioning decision courts challenging sporting sanctions through courts difficult risky process matt totman colm ogrady examine conditions satisfied

Jurisdictions:
England Wales Australia Scotland Europe UK

Options:
Share This Page



Sanctions: Challenging a sanctioning decision in the courts

Challenging sporting sanctions through the courts can be a difficult and risky process. Matt Totman and Colm O'Grady examine the conditions that must be satisfied for judicial review to apply and assess whether, under the developed principles of public law, judicial review of a sporting body's sanctioning decision can be denied.

You must be logged in and have an active full subscription to view full articles. Log in now

Comments

You must be logged in and have an active full subscription to view and post comments. Log in now

Subscribe to World Sports Law Report
Register for a Free Trial to World Sports Law Report
E-Law Alerts
World Sports Law Report Pricing
Feedback
Player Contracts 2013
Player Contracts 2013

Search


Can’t find what you are looking for? Try an Advanced Search

Social Media

Follow us on TwitterView our LinkedIn ProfileWorld Sports Law Report RSS Feed