Volume: 10 Issue: 4
(April 2012)
Keywords:
sanctions
challenging
sanctioning
decision
courts
challenging
sporting
sanctions
through
courts
difficult
risky
process
matt
totman
colm
ogrady
examine
conditions
satisfied
Jurisdictions:
England
Wales
Australia
Scotland
Europe
UK
Options:
![]()
Challenging sporting sanctions through the courts can be a difficult and risky process. Matt Totman and Colm O'Grady examine the conditions that must be satisfied for judicial review to apply and assess whether, under the developed principles of public law, judicial review of a sporting body's sanctioning decision can be denied.
HOT TOPIC: Premier League Financial Fair Play Regulations
Interview with Graham Arthur, UK Anti-Doping Director of Legal Interview with Andy Parkinson, Chief Executive of UK Anti-Doping Interview with Richard McLaren, Arbitrator at the Court of Arbitration for Sport Interview: Maxime Verhagen, Dutch Minister for Economic Affairs, Innovation and Agriculture UK: Legal Services Act: what it means for the legal industryUEFA's Financial Fair Play Regulations and compliance with EU law
Cricket disciplinary appeal is an Arbitration
ASADA investigates the NRL - a legal perspective
Free TV Australia proposes ban on the promotion of live odds
Liar, Liar - Should Polygraph Evidence be used in Sports Tribunals?
Former Chelsea Football Club Sports Psychologist sues Vancouver Canucks over work permit dispute
Newcastle could appeal to FIFA against FA’s decision not to sanction McManaman
Education and Intervention Key To Tackling Doping in Sport
Tacking Doping in Sport Day 2: Code Revisions Need Closer Examination