Volume: 2 Issue: 2
(February 2004)
Keywords:
racing
regulating
horse
racing
challenging
future
behaviour
undermining
integrity
sport
threat
governmental
european
commission
intervention
catastrophic
decline
Jurisdictions:
Europe
UK
England
EU
Options:
![]()
Behaviour undermining the integrity of a sport? The threat of governmental or European Commission intervention? A catastrophic decline in commercial rights income? The media’s column inches are invariably being filled by such issues.
Ironically interest in sport is growing substantially, horseracing in particular enjoying considerable attention for far more positive reasons than the lurid allegations that have filled the tabloids of late1. This article will consider the regulation of horse racing against that background and the external demands now being placed on it that will arguably shape its future.
HOT TOPIC: Premier League Financial Fair Play Regulations
Interview with Graham Arthur, UK Anti-Doping Director of Legal Interview with Andy Parkinson, Chief Executive of UK Anti-Doping Interview with Richard McLaren, Arbitrator at the Court of Arbitration for Sport Interview: Maxime Verhagen, Dutch Minister for Economic Affairs, Innovation and Agriculture UK: Legal Services Act: what it means for the legal industryFree TV Australia proposes ban on the promotion of live odds
Liar, Liar - Should Polygraph Evidence be used in Sports Tribunals?
Former Chelsea Football Club Sports Psychologist sues Vancouver Canucks over work permit dispute
Newcastle could appeal to FIFA against FA’s decision not to sanction McManaman
Education and Intervention Key To Tackling Doping in Sport
Tacking Doping in Sport Day 2: Code Revisions Need Closer Examination
February WSLR Editorial: Silo-busting: integrity's new frontier
FIFA Licenses Goal-Line Technology Companies