Recent Searches:
e-sports
cotonou
FA Football Agents Regulations
preventing an inherent problem
Football Agents Regulations
The tax consequences
Liability for VAT on player
Taxation issues facing sports stars performing
immigration
iaaf hyperandrogenism
Popular Searches:
football association
football association
football association
rabobank
fa
fa
fa
union of european football associations
union of european football associations
cjeu
The monthly law journal providing guidance on all aspects of sports law, including licensing and sports data, anti-doping and doping sanctions, TV and broadcasting rights, sport technology, players agents, disciplinary measures, sports integrity, sports betting, player contracts, intellectual property, transfer regulations, sports sponsorship and marketing, and governance, as well as coverage of key legal cases, sporting regulations and governing bodies including the IOC, UEFA and FIFA and sporting events such as London 2012. / read more

Would you spray a product derived from deer antler velvet into your mouth in order to aid recouperation from a back or knee pain? You would do that without question? OK. If you were a professional athlete, would you use such a spray if you knew it came from a company called Sports With Alternatives To Steroids (SWATS)? Comfortable with that? OK. How about if you visited the SWATS website and were greeted by background pictures of bodybuilders ‘feeling the burn’ and stocked with products such as ‘Jacked Spray’. Still comfortable? If you looked at the people behind SWATS and found they were bodybuilders and not scientists. Still unconcerned? How about if you checked the ingredients of the spray and found that it contained IGF-1, which features on the World Anti-Doping Agency’s Prohibited List?
Vijay Singh’s lawsuit is surprising, because under the strict liability conditions mandated by Article 2.1 of the Code, he has been very lucky. Professional athletes know that they are responsible for what goes into their body and that ignorance is not a defence for violating the World Anti-Doping Code. Singh’s lawsuit claims that he checked the spray bottle and SWATS said that their products were all-natural and didn’t contain any banned substances. There is a raft of case law in anti-doping which illustrates that this is no defence.
However, the lawsuit again highlights the difficulties that international sporting federations face when the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) moves the goalposts. Singh’s lawsuit arose because the PGA Tour was forced to drop its charges against him after WADA confirmed that it no longer considers ‘deer antler spray’ to be prohibited. This was news to the PGA Tour. It now faces a legal battle which if Singh wins, will undermine the anti-doping process and in which it is accused of 'recklesss administration and implementation of its Anti-Doping Program'.
If Singh’s lawsuit is successful and he is awarded damages, the danger is that this case could embolden athletes who have (arguably) not carried out sufficient checks on the substances they are using. Currently, the onus is on the athlete to check that the substance they are using is not on any prohibited lists. Do we really want to put the onus on international federations to check with WADA that their lists have not been amended? This will be something for the court to decide…
• World Sports Law Report will be hosting its Player Contracts 2013 conference on 11 July in central London. For more information, visit http://www.cecileparkconferences.com/player-contracts-2013
EXCLUSIVE: Pound: international anti-doping system is failing
HOT TOPIC: Premier League Financial Fair Play Regulations Interview with Graham Arthur, UK Anti-Doping Director of Legal Interview with Andy Parkinson, Chief Executive of UK Anti-Doping Interview with Richard McLaren, Arbitrator at the Court of Arbitration for Sport Interview: Maxime Verhagen, Dutch Minister for Economic Affairs, Innovation and Agriculture UK: Legal Services Act: what it means for the legal industryUEFA's Financial Fair Play Regulations and compliance with EU law
Cricket disciplinary appeal is an Arbitration
ASADA investigates the NRL - a legal perspective
Free TV Australia proposes ban on the promotion of live odds
Liar, Liar - Should Polygraph Evidence be used in Sports Tribunals?
Former Chelsea Football Club Sports Psychologist sues Vancouver Canucks over work permit dispute
Newcastle could appeal to FIFA against FA’s decision not to sanction McManaman
Education and Intervention Key To Tackling Doping in Sport
Tacking Doping in Sport Day 2: Code Revisions Need Closer Examination